![]() |
U.S. Office of Personnel
Management FY 2000 |
| (Revolving Fund Account - continued) | |
| Additional Information Available on the Next Page | |
| RESOURCES | FY 1998 Actual |
FY 1999 Estimate |
FY 2000 Request |
FY 2000 Change |
| Obligations | $18,906 |
$22,401 |
$22,795 |
$394 |
| Full-Time Equivalents | 62 |
69 |
69 |
--- |
Executive Resources programs are committed to the development of Federal executives who are exceptional leaders, who understand their constitutional role, and who possess a broad, corporate view. The Federal Executive Institute (FEI), Management Development Centers (MDCs), and Schedule C and SES Orientation programs are residential and non-residential programs designed to instill common corporate values, develop management and executive skills, improve understanding of important public issues and stimulate Federal management awareness.
In order to meet these responsibilities, the Office of Executive and Management Development recruits highly-experienced faculty and administrative staff with expertise in human resources development, organization behavior, political science, and customer service. As needed, we supplement this with contract, adjunct faculty who have subject matter expertise in a variety of curricula and support fields. The skills of the professional and technical staff are continuously upgraded. A new training tracking and administrative support system is being implemented that is Y2K compliant and speeds customer service and administrative support.
FY 2000 Priorities
Executive Resources has identified three priorities for FY 2000 in support of the overall OPM priorities described in the Executive Summary.
The first priority is to improve the performance of Federal career leaders by providing high quality, competency based, intellectually challenging, affordable, interagency residential seminars for senior-level managers in the areas of leadership, management and policy implementation at the Federal Executive Institute in Charlottesville, VA and the Management Development Centers in Denver, CO, and Shepherdstown, WV (ER Goal7).
The second priority is to ensure that the executive and managerial training and development programs and curriculum reflect current trends in Government, leadership competencies, and changes in policy direction by using the ongoing assessment of results for continuous review and update. (ER Goal 6)
The third priority is to increase participation by 4.2 % over FY 1999 to almost 7,800 participants, and end-of-course, cumulative ratings of program content, relevance, and facilities to at least 4.4 on a 5 point scale (ER Goal 6).
ANNUAL PERFORMANCE GOALS FOR FY 2000
BY STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL AND OBJECTIVE
| OPM STRATEGIC PLAN GOAL IV: deliver high quality, cost-effective human resources services to federal agencies, employees, annuitants and the public. | ||
FY 2000 Resource Summary: |
Obligations (000): $22,795 |
|
|
| ER Goal 6: FY 1999/2000 |
OPM executive and management development programs and services are high quality, timely, and customer-oriented and are relevant to individual and organizational performance improvement. |
|---|
| Broaden impact of executive and managerial development through participation from all agencies and their components. | ||
| Assess overall program quality and effectiveness
through the use and analysis of end-of-course evaluations for training and development
programs. Additional measures address how well courses improve participants
individual and organizational effectiveness back in the agency. In FY 1998, ERs residential and non-residential executive development programs contributed to creating a corporate body of managers and executives by giving over 6,700 participants an extended exposure to colleagues from across government and by explicitly addressing national and governmental roles of Federal leaders. Each center maintained or improved a historically high end-of-course, cumulative rating of program content, relevance and facilities (4.60 out of 5 at FEI; 4.60 out of 5 at Eastern MDC; and 4.66 out of 5 at Western MDC). In FY 1999, it is estimated that over 7,400 managers and executives will participate in OPM programs (a 10.4% increase over FY 1998), and participant ratings will meet or exceed a standard of 4.4 on a 5 point scale. In FY 2000, increase participation by 4.2 % over FY 1999 to almost 7,800 participants, and end-of-course, cumulative ratings of program content, relevance, and facilities will meet or exceed a standard of 4.4 on a 5 point scale. |
||
| In FY 2000, expand pilot program efforts to measure the amount of learning that takes place in courses and seminars. Data is based on participants self rating of their knowledge of the subject matter covered in the target seminar before and after completion of the program. The pilot before/after knowledge comparison shows an almost 50 percent increase in seminar participant subject matter knowledge after completion of the target seminar. | ||
| Ensure executive and
managerial training and development programs and curriculum reflect current trends in
Government, leadership competencies, and changes in policy direction. Use ongoing
assessment of results for continuous review and update. In FY 1998, the Results Act CD-Rom produced by the Office of Executive Resources (ER) was distributed to several thousand government executives and managers. ER also participated in a NAPA sponsored Performance Consortium consisting of 26 federal agencies to assist in GPRA implementation. In FY 1998, the ER finalized a curriculum redesign for its core management programs. This redesign was prompted by the issuance of the new Executive Core Qualifications (ECQs) and Competencies, and provided an opportunity to use the ECQs as a way to ensure that our core courses cover all of the competencies and as a way to explain to our customers what the courses cover. These courses assist Federal agencies in the development of their managers and executives by fostering a corporate perspective of the Federal service, an understanding of the constitutional framework for public governance, and the leadership skills needed to assure the government is run efficiently and effectively. In FY 1998, two new, self-supporting executive development learning centers were opened to serve the federal community. The new facilities at the Federal Executive Institute in Charlottesville, VA and the Management Development Center in Shepardstown, WV will strengthen OPMs capacity to instill common corporate values, develop executive and management skills, improve understanding of important public policy issues, stimulate Federal management awareness, and ultimately improve the performance of Government. In FY 1998, FEIs Center for Executive Leadership (CEL) grew dramatically by developing a list of ten short, open enrollment programs designed to present key theories, provide opportunities for practice, and build mastery of the program content; helping agencies through consulting on team development, strategic planning, and other issues; and, developing custom designed presentations for our client agencies. It achieved its goal of having a full roster of executive development activities ready for the opening of FEIs new facility. In FY 1998, the Western Management Development Center assisted Region VI of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA-Dallas) in their efforts to develop a corporate culture to support its administrative and legislative requirements. The process started at the beginning of FY 1998 and will extend into FY 1999. This multilayered approach consists of a detailed organizational analysis followed by a series of intense evaluation and planning sessions for all levels of management in the region. As a result, the region has a clearer picture of its strengths and weaknesses and a clear plan to implement its expectations. For FY 1999, the entire ER delivery system is working to develop special programs for both the Department of the Treasury and the Federal Aviation Administration. These programs will help those agencies develop a corporate culture, improve their communication skills, and improve management and leadership skills. |
||
| The Federal Executive Institutes on-going multi-year evaluation project is designed specifically to measure program quality and effectiveness in 10-12 different areas. Some of these areas regularly include: pre-program sponsor forms and participant objectives surveys which indicate expectations in advance of the program, on-site evaluations of every element of the program, and post-program feedback from alumni and agencies. Major initiatives in FY 2000 will include: 1) a continuing survey of sponsors and key agency officials to determine the effectiveness of the Institutes programs; 2) revision of pre-program sponsors form to link objectives to action-planning and post-program follow-up with agency sponsors; 3) use of computer based simulations to allow high-level skills "practice" to measure improvement; and 40 post-program case studies of cross-functional groups that have been part of multi-phase training at the Institute (e.g., Regulatory agencies working on similar issues and measuring improvement over time). | ||
| In FY 2000, survey data from recent graduates of Management Development Center (MDC) seminars will be used to develop information on how to increase the ability of MDC alumni to apply the knowledge they gained in ER programs back at their work place. This information will also be used to improve the design of our programs. | ||
| In FY 2000, begin piloting a Federal analogue of The Corporate University Exchange to share bench marking data on leading edge management development programs with agency counterparts. | ||
| In FY 2000, seek membership in executive development consortiums (i.e., government, academia, business) for the purpose of benchmarking our programs and identifying meaningful evaluation and measurement techniques used in other executive development programs. | ||
Additional Information Available on the Next Page
Web Page Created 14 May 1999